Tuesday, May 12, 2009

DEMOCRAT NEO-TRIBALISTS WILL DESTROY AMERICAN CULTURE AS WELL AS WESTERN CIVILIZATION

ARE NEO-TRIBALIST ELITES DEMAGOGUING THE VULNERABLE WITH HATRED AND BLAME? RATHER THAN INTELLECTUALLY HONEST LEADERSHIP AND PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY?


WHY ARE COMMUNITIES WHERE THE DEMOCRAT PARTY HAS BEEN IN CONTROL INCREASINGLY CORRUPT, ESCALATING CRIME RATE, AND SOCIAL CHAOS???

BECAUSE OF NEO-TRIBALISM

HAVE NEO-TRIBALIST ELITES DELUDED THEIR SHEEPLE INTO BELIEVING THAT AMERICA IS THE SOURCE OF THEIR PROBLEMS?

ARE NEO-TRIBALIST ELITES USING ISLAM TO DESTROY WESTERN CIVILIZATION?

DID AMERICA BLAMING NEO-TRIBALIST ELITES (BIDEN, HILLARY, EDWARDS AND GORE) VOTE FOR THE WAR IN IRAQ, KNOWING FULL WELL THAT THEY COULD USE THE WAR IN IRAQ TO SEIZE PERMANENT POWER IN AMERICA?

ARE AMERICA BLAMING NEO-TRIBALIST ELITES USING ISRAEL TO ULTIMATELY DESTROY THE AMERICAN MILITARY, ALONG WITH ISRAEL AND AMERICA?

HAVE NEO-TRIBALIST ELITES DELUDED THEIR SHEEPLE INTO BELIEVING THAT DESTROYING AMERICA WILL SOLVE THEIR PROBLEMS?

DO NEO-TRIBALIST ELITES HOLD ONTO POWER BY HATE-MONGERING, BLAME-SHIFTING, GRIVANCE-MONGERING, AND ANCESTRAL HATE-ASSIGNMENT?

DO NEO-TRIBALIST ELITES HOLD ONTO POWER BY NEO-TRIBAL WARFARE TACTICS THAT CHICAGOIZE THE COUNTRY




Radical neo-Tribalists such as John Zerzan believe that healthy tribal life can only thrive after technological civilization has either been destroyed or severely reduced in scope. Daniel Quinn, associated with the New tribalists, formulated the concept of "walking away": abandoning the owner/conqueror worldview of civilization--though not necessarily its geographical space--and making a living with others in tribal businesses.

Others, such as Derrick Jensen, argue that both violent and nonviolent efforts are called for, as they believe that it is appropriate and necessary to actively accelerate or cause a collapse of civilization.

Still others, such as The Tribe of Anthropik take a survivalist bent and believe that a collapse is inevitable no matter what is done or said and concentrate their efforts on surviving and forming tribal cultures in the aftermath.

In general radical neotribalist groups tend to agree that the current population of humanity is unsustainable and thus a form of cultural change is fundamentally necessary, rather than simply desirable, and that the preferable, or perhaps inevitable form for society to take after this change is tribalism.

The call for a revolution is intended to either accomplish or survive this change.

Anarcho-primitivism has been cited as an influence on or even a variant of radical neotribalism.[citation needed]

Radicals interpret the 'environment' of the Evolutionary Principle to be mainly physical and economic.


IS MULTICULTURALISM A LIBERAL CODE WORD FOR NEO-TRIBALISM?